Leadership Challenge

Strengthening the Leadership Pipeline

Every organization says its pipeline is a priority and most can’t say how deep it actually is. Our research on 2 million assessments shows the problem usually isn’t development, it’s that the wrong people were identified in the first place.

Signs your leadership pipeline is thin

What is a leadership pipeline?

▸Definition

A leadership pipeline is an organization's supply of people ready to take on larger leadership roles, at every level. A strong pipeline means named, assessed, actively developing candidates for critical roles — not a list of names on a succession chart.

Pipeline vs. succession planning

Succession planning identifies who would fill specific roles. A pipeline is the broader capability that makes succession planning possible: a continuously developing population at every level, so the slate has real options rather than the least-bad one. Organizations frequently have the second without the first — a documented succession plan resting on candidates nobody has developed or measured.

The distinction has a practical consequence. Succession planning is an annual exercise; a pipeline is a standing capability. If your pipeline work happens in the four weeks before the talent review, you have succession planning.

Our research on the mechanics of filling a pipeline: Filling the Leadership Pipeline  

And on why the timing of development determines pipeline depth: Leadership Development: Are You Starting Too Late?

Why leadership pipelines stay thin

Identification is broken

Organizations invest in developing identified talent without checking whether they identified the right people. When HiPo lists rely on visibility and tenure, development dollars miss overlooked talent.

Current performance ≠ future potential

What makes someone excellent in their current role may not prepare them for the next level. “Who’s ready?” too often becomes “Who’s best right now?”

Development starts too late

Low trust shows up as slower decisions and information that stops flowing upward. By the time it reaches turnover data, it’s been eroding for a year.

What the research says about building a leadership pipeline

Potential is more evenly distributed than HiPo lists suggest.

When leadership capacity is measured rather than nominated, the population of viable candidates is consistently larger — and different — than the list produced by senior leaders’ impressions. That’s the cheapest available way to deepen a pipeline: measure the people you already employ.

Readiness is a strengths question.

Since extraordinary leaders are defined by a handful of profound strengths rather than the absence of weakness, “ready” doesn’t mean “no gaps.” It means possessing strengths that matter at the next level with no fatal flaw present. Slates built on absence-of-weakness reliably promote the safe, unremarkable candidate.

Also relevant, and often the missing organizational argument: Leadership Development — A Strategic Imperative for Future-Ready Organizations

Based on a study of over 2 million assessments.

How to strengthen your leadership pipeline

Six steps, in the order that actually works.

Circular badge with teal border displaying the number 1 (Step 1).

Audit identification before funding more development

Ask how each name on the HiPo list got there. If the answer is proximity, tenure or current performance, the list is the problem and no amount of program spend will fix the pipeline.

Circular badge showing the number 2, used as a step indicator (Step 2)

Measure potential across the population

Multi-rater data on the people who aren't on the list is where pipeline depth actually comes from. This is the single highest-yield move available and most organizations have never made it.

Circular badge featuring the number 3 in dark text on a light background with a teal border

Assess coachability alongside capability

Two candidates with identical profiles convert development at very different rates. Willingness to seek and act on feedback is measurable in advance and predicts who will actually move.

Number 4 inside a teal circular badge (step indicator)

Start development one level early

Develop for the next role while the person is still in the current one; pre-promotion, when it's cheap and low-risk. This is the structural fix for a thin bench, and it's a budgeting decision more than a program design one.

Circular badge with the number 5 in dark text, teal border and white center (step/level indicator).

Define readiness behaviorally, not by tenure.

"Ready in 2 years" is a placeholder. "Ready when they demonstrate these three behaviors at this level" is a plan, and it tells the candidate what to work on.

Round badge with a teal border displaying the number 6 and a light background surface

Re-measure and re-slate annually against evidence.

Pipelines decay silently. People plateau, leave, or become ready without anyone noticing. Reassessment keeps the slate honest.

Succession planning best practices

Five practices that separate a succession plan that works from a document that exists:

  1. More than one name per role, and no name on more than two slates. A plan where the same three people cover every critical role is a single point of failure with extra paperwork.
  2. Assessment data, not just manager nomination. Nomination captures visibility. Assessment captures capability. A slate built only from the first will systematically miss the quiet, effective candidate.
  3. Development plans attached to every named successor. A named successor with no active development plan is a hope. Each name should have two or three specific goals tied to next-level behaviors.
  4. Tell people, in most cases. The instinct to keep the slate secret protects the organization from awkward conversations and prevents the candidate from developing deliberately. There are exceptions, but secrecy should be the exception.
  5. Review against outcomes, not compliance. The measure of a succession process isn’t whether the template got filled in. It’s whether internal candidates actually filled critical roles — and performed.

Worth reading alongside: Global Leadership Development

How Zenger Folkman helps you build trust

Knowing the three elements is one thing; knowing where your leaders stand on each is another. That’s what these two experiences do.

The Extraordinary Leader™

Strengths-based development for people already leading, and for candidates being prepared one level early.

For deepening readiness at the top of the pipeline.

Extraordinary You™

Development for the non-management population, where pipeline depth is actually created. Surfaces capacity the HiPo list missed.

For widening the base of the pipeline.

360 Degree Feedback Leadership Assessment

Multi-rater data on current leaders and candidates, including the derailing-flaw check, so readiness is evidence-based.

Start here if your HiPo list has never been validated.

Strengthening the leadership pipeline FAQs

What is the difference between a leadership pipeline and succession planning?

Succession planning identifies who would fill specific roles. A pipeline is the standing capability that gives succession planning real options — a continuously developing population at every level. Many organizations have a plan without a pipeline.

Multiple candidates per critical role, assessment data rather than nomination alone, an active development plan attached to every named successor, transparency with candidates in most cases, and reviewing the process against whether internal candidates actually filled roles.

With measured data on the behaviors that differentiate effective leaders, plus coachability, plus asked aspiration. Current-role performance is the most available signal and a poor predictor of performance one level up.

At least two viable candidates for each critical role, with no individual named on more than two slates. If the same people appear everywhere, the pipeline is narrower than the document suggests.

Before promotion. Pre-promotion development is cheaper and more effective than post-promotion remediation, and the delay is the most common structural cause of a thin bench.

By the proportion of critical roles with two or more assessed, actively developing internal candidates — not by the number of names on a chart. Assessment data is what makes the number meaningful.

Find out how deep your bench actually is

A short conversation is enough for us to recommend where to start.