Quality vs. Quantity: Unraveling the Leadership Dilemma

October 21, 2024

Quality vs Quantity

Leaders often grapple with a seemingly impossible choice: quality vs. quantity? This age-old debate has sparked countless discussions and strategies across industries. But what if we told you this dichotomy might be a false one? Recent research suggests that the most effective leaders don’t see quality and quantity as mutually exclusive goals but as complementary objectives that can be achieved simultaneously.

The Quality vs. Quantity Conundrum

Many organizations view quality and quantity as competing objectives. Some leaders believe that consistently high-quality products or services require slowing down production.  In contrast, others argue that meeting market demands through large-scale production inevitably leads to compromises in quality. This perspective sees quality and quantity as opposite ends of a continuum, forcing organizations to choose a point along this spectrum.

What the Data Reveals

A study by Zenger Folkman, analyzing data from over 10,000 leaders worldwide, sheds new light on this quality vs. quantity debate. We created a self-assessment that measured leaders’ preferences for quality or quantity. The self-assessment asked leaders their preference between “getting things done” and “doing things accurately and well” with items such as “moving more quickly” or “taking time to get things done right.” The findings highlight important trends:

  1. Leader Preferences: 60% of leaders prefer quantity (getting a lot done), while 40% prefer quality (getting things done right).
  2. Organizational Hierarchy: Top management tends to be more quantity-oriented, while individual contributors are almost evenly split between quality and quantity preferences.
  3. Gender Differences: 64% of men prefer quantity compared to 58% of women—a small but statistically significant difference.
  4. Geographical Variations: European and Canadian leaders show a stronger preference for quantity than their U.S. counterparts, while Central/South American leaders are more quality-oriented.
    Quality vs. Quantity geographies
  5. Functional Disparities: Sales (69%), Marketing (65%), and Operations (60%) are more quantity-oriented, while Safety (69%), Facilities (56%), and Legal (52%) lean towards quality.

The Surprising Link to Leadership Effectiveness

Perhaps the most intriguing finding is the correlation between leadership effectiveness and orientation towards quality or quantity. Each leader had been evaluated by, on average, 13 people, including immediate managers, peers, direct reports, and others. The graph below shows the results of the analysis. The variable measured was overall leadership effectiveness. This is an average of 49 individual behaviors. The percentile scores show where leaders ranked relative to global norms. In this self-assessment, we found that 107 leaders had a quality preference, and 173 leaders had a quantity preference. The study revealed that leaders with a quantity preference were perceived as more effective overall. This challenges the common assumption that a focus on quality is always superior.

Quality vs Quantity Overall Effectiveness

Reframing the Quality vs. Quantity Debate

The research suggests that effective leaders don’t view quality and quantity as a zero-sum game. Instead, they recognize these as two separate continuums, acknowledging that organizations can achieve both high-quality and large-scale production simultaneously.

Strategies for Balancing Quality and Quantity

  1. Shift Your Mindset: Stop thinking of quality and quantity as mutually exclusive. Instead, think of two separate continuums. Organizations can have high or low quality, just as they can have small to large-scale production. Successful leaders understand it’s not an “either-or” choice.
  2. Implement Smart Quality Control: Utilize independent inspections and elevated specifications to maintain both speed and accuracy. Quality-oriented leaders are perceived in general as being less effective, apparently because of their narrowness. Additionally, they tend to slow down to avoid making mistakes.
  3. Broaden Perspectives: Expose quality assurance teams to the costs of slow production and help manufacturing leaders understand the implications of quality failures. The Boeing organization discovered the enormous costs of a single manufacturing and software mistake. The Takata organization filed for bankruptcy in Japan and the United States because of faulty airbag design and manufacture.
  4. Learn from Success Stories: Study organizations like Costco, which maintains stringent quality standards while continuously expanding its distribution scale.

Conclusion: Breaking the False Dichotomy

The key takeaway is clear: quality and quantity are not inherently at odds. The most effective leaders understand that it’s possible— and indeed necessary— to strive for both. By reframing the debate and approaching quality and quantity as dual objectives, organizations can realize new potentials for growth and excellence.

As you navigate the complex landscape of modern business, remember that the question isn’t “quality or quantity?” but rather “how can we achieve both?” This shift in perspective could be the key to unlocking your organization’s full potential.

—Jack Zenger

 

KEY LEARNING: Quality vs. Quantity

The article challenges the traditional “quality vs. quantity” debate by presenting research that shows these two objectives are not mutually exclusive. Effective leaders view quality and quantity as separate continuums and strive to achieve both simultaneously. A study by Zenger Folkman revealed that while a majority of leaders prioritize quantity, those who do so are often perceived as more effective. The key takeaway is that organizations should shift their mindset to see quality and quantity as complementary goals, enabling them to meet high standards while scaling production. By balancing these dual objectives, businesses can unlock greater growth and success.

Download our newest eBook!