The Leadership Skills Needed at Every Level

March 28, 2022

Years ago, we were asked to analyze a competency model for leadership development that a client had created. It was based on the idea that at different points in their development, potential leaders need to focus on excelling at different leadership skills. For example, they proposed that a lower-level manager should focus on driving for results while top executives should focus on developing a strategic perspective.

Intuitively, this makes sense. It is based on the assumption that once people develop a skill, they will continue to exercise it. But, interestingly, we don’t apply it in athletics; athletes continue to practice and develop the same skills throughout their careers. And as we thought about the excellent senior executives we have met, we observed that they are, in fact, all very focused on delivering results. Many of the best lower-level managers are absolutely clear about strategy and vision. This got us wondering: Are some leadership skills less important for leaders at certain levels of the organization? Or is there a set of leadership skills fundamental to every level?

To find out, we compiled a dataset in which we asked 332,860 bosses, peers, and direct reports what leadership skills had the greatest impact on a leader’s success in the position the respondents currently held. Each respondent selected the top four competencies out of a list of 16 that we provided. We then compared the results for managers at different levels.

As you might expect, the leadership skills people reported as most important depended not only on their level in the organization but also on the job they held and their particular circumstances. Even so, there was a remarkable consistency in the data about which leadership skills were perceived as most important in all four levels of the organization we measured. The same competencies were selected as most important for the supervisors, middle managers, and senior managers alike, and six out of the seven topped the list for top executives. Our respondent reported that executives at every organizational level need a balance of these competencies. The other nine competencies included in the study were chosen only half as frequently as the top seven.

What Leadership Skills Do You Need Most?

These results suggest that as people move up the organization, the fundamental leadership skills they need will not dramatically change. Still, our data further indicate the relative importance of the seven leadership skills does change to some degree as people move up. So, in the graph above, the top seven competencies are listed in order of importance, as it happens, for the supervisory group. With middle managers, problem-solving moves ahead of everything else. Then for senior management, communicating powerfully and prolifically moves to the number two spot. Only for top executives does a new competency enter the mix as the ability to develop a strategic perspective (which had been moving steadily up the lower ranks) moves into the number five position.

What to make of all this? From our analysis, we conclude that there is some logic to focusing on distinct competencies at different stages of development. But, more fundamentally, it shows us that there are leadership skills that are critical to you throughout your career. And if you wait until you’re a top manager to develop a strategic perspective, it will be too late. Our research has further indicated that a lack of strategic perspective is considered a fatal flaw even when your current job does not require it. Your managers want to see you demonstrate that skill before they promote you.

So it is useful to ask yourself which competencies are most critical for you right now. But it’s also crucial to ask yourself which competencies will be most critical in the future for the next-level job. Demonstrating those leadership skills in your current job provides evidence that you will be successful in the next job.

—Joe Folkman & Jack Zenger
Connect with Zenger Folkman on LinkedInTwitter, and Facebook.

(This article first appeared on HBR)